Zimbabwean vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,678,317 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 76.0 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $74,224, a difference of 31.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $128,723, a difference of 30.6%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $59,066, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $57,740, a difference of 12.6%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $76,686, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 29.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 51.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 45.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.13%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.5%).