Zimbabwean vs Hopi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hopi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Hopi

Exceptional
Poor
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hopi Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,606,607 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.744% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 743.9 Hopi.
Zimbabwean Integration in Hopi Communities

Zimbabwean vs Hopi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $31,177, a difference of 46.9%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $77,188, a difference of 42.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $75,562, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $46,978, a difference of 9.1%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $33,932, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $50,925, a difference of 29.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Hopi Income
Income MetricZimbabweanHopi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$31,177
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$77,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$65,043
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$36,871
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$42,060
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$33,932
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$46,978
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$75,002
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$75,562
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$50,925
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
20.0%

Zimbabwean vs Hopi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 127.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 110.1%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 104.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 38.1%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 43.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Hopi Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanHopi
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
23.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
27.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
27.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
27.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
28.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
18.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
21.6%

Zimbabwean vs Hopi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 147.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 128.3%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 125.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Hopi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanHopi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
30.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.4%

Zimbabwean vs Hopi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Hopi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanHopi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
58.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
31.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
75.0%

Zimbabwean vs Hopi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 77.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.60, a difference of 12.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Hopi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanHopi
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
36.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.60
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
36.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
50.8%

Zimbabwean vs Hopi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 51.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Hopi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanHopi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
13.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
86.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
49.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
6.9%

Zimbabwean vs Hopi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 71.1%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 63.0%), and associate's degree (51.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).
Zimbabwean vs Hopi Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanHopi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
88.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
57.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
50.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
34.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
25.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Zimbabwean vs Hopi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 293.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 10.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Hopi Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanHopi
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
4.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
30.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
52.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%