Central American Indian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,427,438 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.766. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 64.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $77,465, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $116,156, a difference of 33.9%), and median family income ($88,034 compared to $116,188, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.2%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $41,461, a difference of 15.4%), and median earnings ($41,474 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 127.5%), family poverty (13.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 104.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 39.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and single father poverty (21.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 40.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.0%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.6%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.2%), and births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.20%), family households (65.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 62.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 93.1%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and associate's degree (40.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.6%), male disability (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.7%).