Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Macedonians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,408,746 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 22.3 Macedonians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Macedonian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,564, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,563, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,618 compared to $90,761, a difference of 0.16%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $107,074, a difference of 0.21%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $109,668, a difference of 0.31%).
Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
28.6%

Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.49%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanMacedonian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.9%

Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanMacedonian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%

Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.58%).
Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.5%

Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.53%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanMacedonian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
27.9%

Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.5%

Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.6%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).
Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanMacedonian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%