Zimbabwean vs Seminole Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Seminole
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Seminole

Exceptional
Poor
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Seminole Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,893,882 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 17.1 Seminole.
Zimbabwean Integration in Seminole Communities

Zimbabwean vs Seminole Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $80,077, a difference of 33.4%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $83,354, a difference of 32.0%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $69,420, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,649, a difference of 12.3%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $34,385, a difference of 18.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Seminole Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSeminole
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$36,180
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$83,354
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$69,420
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$40,233
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$46,783
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$34,385
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$45,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$76,584
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$80,077
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$52,373
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Good
25.6%

Zimbabwean vs Seminole Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 57.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 56.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 16.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Seminole Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSeminole
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
22.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
21.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
16.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
35.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.8%

Zimbabwean vs Seminole Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Seminole Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSeminole
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%

Zimbabwean vs Seminole Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Seminole Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSeminole
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
62.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
78.1%

Zimbabwean vs Seminole Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 32.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Seminole Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSeminole
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
44.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
37.9%

Zimbabwean vs Seminole Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Seminole Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSeminole
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.0%

Zimbabwean vs Seminole Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.8%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Zimbabwean vs Seminole Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSeminole
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Poor
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
87.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
59.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
52.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
37.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Zimbabwean vs Seminole Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 51.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Seminole Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSeminole
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
29.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%