Zimbabwean vs Panamanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,275,368 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Panamanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 28.5 Panamanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $58,266, a difference of 13.0%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $97,683, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $96,066, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,611, a difference of 0.69%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,049, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,593, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.99%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 38.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.37%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.9%).