Costa Rican vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Costa Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Costa Ricans

Chinese

Average
Exceptional
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Costa Rican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,974,547 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.762. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 29.5 Chinese.
Costa Rican Integration in Chinese Communities

Costa Rican vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $116,156, a difference of 13.0%), and median household income ($87,262 compared to $98,496, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($44,090 compared to $46,098, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $41,461, a difference of 4.6%).
Costa Rican vs Chinese Income
Income MetricCosta RicanChinese
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,090
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Good
$103,989
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,262
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Average
$46,645
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,279
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,622
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,106
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,565
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,779
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,638
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Average
25.9%

Costa Rican vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 41.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.5%).
Costa Rican vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricCosta RicanChinese
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Average
29.0%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
9.8%

Costa Rican vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.4%).
Costa Rican vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCosta RicanChinese
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Costa Rican vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.93%).
Costa Rican vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCosta RicanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
84.1%

Costa Rican vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.0%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Costa Rican vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCosta RicanChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.7%
Excellent
30.2%

Costa Rican vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.9%).
Costa Rican vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCosta RicanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.9%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.8%

Costa Rican vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.5%), college, 1 year or more (58.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and college, under 1 year (64.4% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Costa Rican vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricCosta RicanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.4%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.7%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Fair
1.8%

Costa Rican vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Costa Rican vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricCosta RicanChinese
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.9%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%