Hmong vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Chinese
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,636,399 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.175% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 175.4 Chinese.
Hmong vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $116,156, a difference of 31.8%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $98,496, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 6.9%), median earnings ($42,111 compared to $48,836, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $41,461, a difference of 16.8%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Average 25.9% |
Hmong vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 43.3%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 42.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.1%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.1%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Chinese |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Hmong vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 132.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.91%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Hmong vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.90%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Hmong vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.1%), family households (64.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Hmong vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.8%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Hmong vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Hmong vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |