Iroquois vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,729,163 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.386. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.076% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 76.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $77,465, a difference of 44.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $116,156, a difference of 33.1%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $98,496, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,461, a difference of 13.9%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $48,836, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 68.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 66.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.2%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 38.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (62.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.9%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 39.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.6%).