Zimbabwean vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,045,084 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 225.2 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $98,877, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $97,277, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,429, a difference of 0.91%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,594, a difference of 2.6%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,440, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 47.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.5%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 27.9%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.4%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.93%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 81.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%).