Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,089,306 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.117% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,117.0 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 13.5%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,837, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $97,284, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,609, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,257, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,564, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.1%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.1%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 38.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.9%).