Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Vietnamese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Vietnamese

Exceptional
Fair
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Vietnamese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,058,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.136% in Vietnamese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 136.0 Vietnamese.
Zimbabwean Integration in Vietnamese Communities

Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 25.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $56,143, a difference of 17.3%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $96,123, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,377, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,172, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $92,089, a difference of 7.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Income
Income MetricZimbabweanVietnamese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Poor
$42,368
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$96,123
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Poor
$82,248
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Average
$46,172
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Poor
$52,525
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Excellent
$40,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$56,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Fair
$92,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$93,788
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$56,143
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
21.0%

Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 82.0%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 65.2%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanVietnamese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.7%

Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 39.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanVietnamese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%

Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 31.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanVietnamese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
29.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
80.8%

Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.9%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.29%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanVietnamese
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Excellent
30.2%

Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 190.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 66.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 23.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 62.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanVietnamese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
26.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
73.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
38.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
3.9%

Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 83.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanVietnamese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
93.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
90.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
89.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
87.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
85.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
57.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
1.9%

Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.81%, a difference of 44.9%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.38%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanVietnamese
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.81%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%