Immigrants from Belgium vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,830,157 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.794. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.935% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 1,935.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $46,098, a difference of 19.5%), median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $56,872, a difference of 16.3%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($100,306 compared to $98,496, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,932 compared to $116,156, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.2%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family households (63.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.2%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.66%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.2%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.8%), professional degree (7.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.7%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.9%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.6%).