Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Chinese
1,140
SOCIAL INDEX
9.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
321st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Native/Alaskan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,184,062 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 12.0 Chinese.
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $77,465, a difference of 48.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $116,156, a difference of 45.5%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $98,496, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $58,162, a difference of 21.9%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $41,461, a difference of 22.6%).
Income Metric | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,279 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $80,908 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,879 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,896 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,775 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,806 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,704 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $75,647 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $79,816 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,081 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.6% | Average 25.9% |
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 124.6%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 119.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (24.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 101.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 45.4%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 48.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 57.3%).
Poverty Metric | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 20.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 72.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 69.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.9% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.6%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 55.4%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.45 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 43.0% | Excellent 30.2% |
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.8% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.0% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.4%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 51.0%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%).
Education Level Metric | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 70.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 48.7%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 8.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.9%).
Disability Metric | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 53.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |