Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,565,106 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.956. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.235% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,235.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Difference between Zimbabwean Ancestry and Immigrants from Zimbabwe

While Zimbabwean ancestry and immigrants from Zimbabwe may have similarities, there are subtle differences that set them apart.

Zimbabwean Ancestry

Zimbabwean ancestry refers to a person's genetic, cultural, and historical connection to Zimbabwe through their family lineage. This means that the person has Zimbabwean heritage and is likely to share some characteristics and cultural traits that are associated with Zimbabwe, such as language, customs, and traditions. It is possible to have Zimbabwean ancestry without being an immigrant from Zimbabwe.

Immigrant from Zimbabwe

On the other hand, an immigrant from Zimbabwe is a person who has moved from Zimbabwe to the United States, with the intention of settling there. This person has left their country of origin and has become a citizen or resident of the United States. An immigrant from Zimbabwe may or may not have Zimbabwean ancestry, and their cultural background and identity may be influenced by a combination of their Zimbabwean heritage and the culture of the United States.

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.8%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $47,394, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $63,643, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $97,880, a difference of 0.72%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $108,830, a difference of 1.1%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $89,496, a difference of 1.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Good
25.3%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.56%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.9%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.81%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.59%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.29%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.30%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.69%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Excellent
30.3%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Poor
6.0%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and associate's degree (51.3% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.4%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%