Belgian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,196,037 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.898. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to an increase of 209.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,915 compared to $77,465, a difference of 29.3%), median household income ($84,008 compared to $98,496, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,060 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,361 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.7%), per capita income ($43,951 compared to $46,098, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($46,375 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 67.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.29%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.0%), associate's degree (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and college, 1 year or more (59.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.49%), disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%).