Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nepalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Nepalese

Exceptional
Poor
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,939
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
281st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nepalese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,897,165 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.887. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.390% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 2,390.4 Nepalese.
Zimbabwean Integration in Nepalese Communities

Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $38,442, a difference of 19.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $94,153, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,603, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,472, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $91,498, a difference of 7.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Income
Income MetricZimbabweanNepalese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$38,442
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$94,153
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Poor
$82,410
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$43,860
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$49,458
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$38,603
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$54,472
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Poor
$91,498
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$93,355
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$58,761
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
22.2%

Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 60.1%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 54.0%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanNepalese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Fair
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
18.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.6%

Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.1%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanNepalese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%

Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanNepalese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
33.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
80.5%

Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.9%), family households (64.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanNepalese
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
30.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Poor
45.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
33.5%

Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanNepalese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
24.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
8.7%

Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 120.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 81.3%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanNepalese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
93.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
92.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
92.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
90.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
88.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
85.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
54.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
39.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
29.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Nepalese Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanNepalese
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.97%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
28.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%