Zimbabwean vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,566,716 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.315% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,315.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $41,017, a difference of 11.7%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $71,021, a difference of 7.9%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $52,306, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,618 compared to $89,919, a difference of 0.78%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $105,149, a difference of 1.6%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 35.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.96%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.43, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.95%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 44.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.8%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.4%).