Yakama vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,777,078 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.983. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.381% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 381.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $46,098, a difference of 39.7%), median family income ($83,932 compared to $116,188, a difference of 38.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $58,162, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and median female earnings ($33,354 compared to $41,461, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 145.6%), receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 119.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 102.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.7%), single male poverty (15.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.1%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 47.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 211.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 102.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 91.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 112.2%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.9%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 141.2%), bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 57.2%), and master's degree (9.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 36.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.2%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.3%).