Zimbabwean vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,820,199 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 20.0 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,287, a difference of 5.7%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $88,091, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,226, a difference of 0.010%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,840, a difference of 0.080%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $97,339, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.2%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.17%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.7%).