Zimbabwean vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Houma
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,308,423 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Houma.
Zimbabwean vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $72,093, a difference of 48.2%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $44,822, a difference of 46.9%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $50,547, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $44,356, a difference of 15.6%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $38,949, a difference of 23.8%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 38.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 94.8%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 87.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 28.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 49.4%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.3%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 48.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 7.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 74.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 62.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Houma |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 46.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.1%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 137.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 134.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 124.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 0.96% |
Zimbabwean vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 78.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 75.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.9%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Houma |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.0% |