Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,975,514 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 34.2 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $80,544, a difference of 22.4%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $37,464, a difference of 22.3%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $90,345, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,691, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,000, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 42.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 35.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.5%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 68.7%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 64.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.8%).