Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Salvadoran
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Salvadorans

Exceptional
Fair
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,588
SOCIAL INDEX
23.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
250th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Salvadoran Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,325,756 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.630% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 630.4 Salvadorans.
Zimbabwean Integration in Salvadoran Communities

Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $38,858, a difference of 17.9%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $94,109, a difference of 16.9%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $48,646, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $55,412, a difference of 8.1%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $82,449, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $37,083, a difference of 10.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSalvadoran
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$38,858
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$94,109
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Poor
$82,449
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$42,912
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$48,646
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$37,083
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$55,412
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$88,198
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$94,842
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Poor
$59,141
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.0%

Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 59.8%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 39.3%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.5%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSalvadoran
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.2%

Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSalvadoran
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%

Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.81%).
Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSalvadoran
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.6%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.58%), family households (64.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSalvadoran
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
29.9%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
44.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.48
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
36.0%

Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.6%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSalvadoran
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Excellent
56.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.8%

Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 116.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSalvadoran
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
93.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
91.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
90.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
89.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
87.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
86.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
84.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
81.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
78.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
57.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
51.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
39.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 15.9%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.070%), disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Salvadoran Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSalvadoran
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
25.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.5%