Bermudan vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bermudan
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bermudans
Chinese
2,838
SOCIAL INDEX
25.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
241st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Bermudan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,180,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 10.119% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 10,119.0 Chinese.
Bermudan vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $77,465, a difference of 33.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,197 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $58,162, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $41,461, a difference of 5.2%), median earnings ($45,593 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.1%), and per capita income ($42,911 compared to $46,098, a difference of 7.4%).
Income Metric | Bermudan | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Fair $42,911 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,577 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,406 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,593 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,465 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,418 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,359 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,231 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,197 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,171 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.1% | Average 25.9% |
Bermudan vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 52.7%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.0%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.7%).
Poverty Metric | Bermudan | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Bermudan vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Bermudan | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bermudan vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bermudan | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Bermudan vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.0%), married-couple households (42.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Bermudan | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Bermudan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 57.5%), no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 55.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bermudan | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Bermudan vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.9%), master's degree (15.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and associate's degree (46.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Education Level Metric | Bermudan | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Good 95.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.2% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Bermudan vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.49%), disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.82%).
Disability Metric | Bermudan | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |