Slovene vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Slovene
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Slovenes
Chinese
8,224
SOCIAL INDEX
79.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
81st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Slovene Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,630,995 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Slovene communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovenes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovenes corresponds to an increase of 52.2 Chinese.
Slovene vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovene and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,241 compared to $77,465, a difference of 28.6%), median household income ($85,562 compared to $98,496, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,886 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.48%), per capita income ($45,581 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($47,995 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Slovene | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,581 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,020 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,562 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,995 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,145 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,817 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,886 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,439 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,885 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $60,241 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.3% | Average 25.9% |
Slovene vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovene and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple family poverty (3.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.0%).
Poverty Metric | Slovene | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.8% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Slovene vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovene and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Unemployment Metric | Slovene | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Slovene vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovene and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
Labor Participation Metric | Slovene | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.7% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Slovene vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovene and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and family households (62.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Slovene | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.8% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.1% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.07 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Slovene vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovene and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Slovene | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Slovene vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovene and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Slovene | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 39.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Slovene vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovene and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Slovene | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |