Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Congo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Congo
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,658,191 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.295% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 295.5 Immigrants from Congo.
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $77,850, a difference of 37.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $72,178, a difference of 36.6%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $66,768, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $43,266, a difference of 18.5%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $34,317, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.3%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Congo |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $35,720 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $82,216 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $66,768 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $39,169 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $44,204 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $34,317 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $43,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $72,178 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $77,850 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $51,393 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 59.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.8%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Congo |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 23.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 22.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 22.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 33.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Congo |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Congo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 41.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.8%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Congo |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 59.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 39.0% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 41.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 36.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Congo |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 52.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 42.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Congo |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 92.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 90.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 61.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 41.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 33.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Congo |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |