Zimbabwean vs Slovak Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,131,607 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 132.2 Slovaks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,039, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $83,798, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,306, a difference of 0.010%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,095, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $49,753, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 16.3%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.87%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 28.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.2%).