Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,380,108 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 58.4 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.2%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $49,893, a difference of 8.9%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $61,220, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $66,620, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $41,771, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,638, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.1%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.070%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.82%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.8%).