Zimbabwean vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Serbians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,323,011 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.355% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 355.4 Serbians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Serbian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,087, a difference of 7.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $87,572, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $98,320, a difference of 0.27%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,106, a difference of 0.30%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,539, a difference of 0.64%).
Zimbabwean vs Serbian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSerbian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.7%

Zimbabwean vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.3%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Zimbabwean vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSerbian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.3%

Zimbabwean vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.81%).
Zimbabwean vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSerbian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Zimbabwean vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.84%).
Zimbabwean vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Zimbabwean vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 7.0%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.87%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSerbian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Good
30.7%

Zimbabwean vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Poor
6.0%

Zimbabwean vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.9%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
Zimbabwean vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.0%

Zimbabwean vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.8%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSerbian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%