Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chinese
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,592,675 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.983. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.633% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 633.0 Chinese.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $77,465, a difference of 20.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.4%), and per capita income ($50,914 compared to $46,098, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($114,826 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.2%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.4%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family households (62.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 9.9%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.60%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 61.2%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 47.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.0%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |