Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,795,005 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.775. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.244% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 244.5 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,638, a difference of 6.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $103,989, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,622, a difference of 3.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $95,565, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,645, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.2%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.3%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).