Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Tsimshian
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,827,353 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.903. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.128% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 4,127.6 Tsimshian.
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $48,836, a difference of 15.3%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $40,344, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $58,202, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $97,809, a difference of 0.79%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,530, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,649, a difference of 6.6%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 65.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 184.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 95.2%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 77.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 46.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.92%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.2%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.7%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 104.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 65.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.5%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |