Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Tsimshian

Exceptional
Average
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,827,353 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.903. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.128% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 4,127.6 Tsimshian.
Zimbabwean Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $48,836, a difference of 15.3%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $40,344, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $58,202, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $97,809, a difference of 0.79%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,530, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,649, a difference of 6.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.9%

Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 65.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanTsimshian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.7%

Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 184.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 95.2%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanTsimshian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.6%

Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
77.4%

Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 46.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.92%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanTsimshian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
42.2%

Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.2%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Fair
6.2%

Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.7%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 104.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 65.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanTsimshian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%