Salvadoran vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,235,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Salvadoran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Salvadorans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Salvadorans corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,141 compared to $77,465, a difference of 31.0%), median family income ($94,109 compared to $116,188, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,842 compared to $116,156, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,412 compared to $58,162, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($37,083 compared to $41,461, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 78.8%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.4%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.3%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.5%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.48 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 154.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and associate's degree (39.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.0%), male disability (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.1%).