Shoshone vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Shoshone
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Shoshone
Chinese
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Shoshone Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,887,963 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.996. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 14.7 Chinese.
Shoshone vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $77,465, a difference of 44.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $116,156, a difference of 39.0%), and median household income ($72,660 compared to $98,496, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.9%), median male earnings ($47,930 compared to $56,872, a difference of 18.6%), and median earnings ($40,932 compared to $48,836, a difference of 19.3%).
Income Metric | Shoshone | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,072 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,872 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,660 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,932 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,930 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,677 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,720 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,062 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,588 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,681 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.4% | Average 25.9% |
Shoshone vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 67.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 67.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.6%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 33.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.3%).
Poverty Metric | Shoshone | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Shoshone vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 93.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 67.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Shoshone | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Shoshone vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Shoshone | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.8% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Shoshone vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.9%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.99%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Shoshone | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.37 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Shoshone vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Shoshone | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Shoshone vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.3%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.8%), and bachelor's degree (29.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Shoshone | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Shoshone vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.4%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and female disability (13.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.1%).
Disability Metric | Shoshone | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |