Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Scandinavians

Exceptional
Good
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,365,506 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 23.6 Scandinavians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.6%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,586, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,306, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,527, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,654, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $95,596, a difference of 3.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
29.1%

Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.3%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.22%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanScandinavian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.7%

Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanScandinavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%

Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Good
83.0%

Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.6%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (64.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanScandinavian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
29.8%

Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
8.0%

Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.9%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
1.8%

Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanScandinavian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%