Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chinese
6,247
SOCIAL INDEX
60.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
158th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Lebanon Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,687,766 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 23.6 Chinese.
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $77,465, a difference of 20.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($91,887 compared to $98,496, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.68%), median earnings ($49,682 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($46,938 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,938 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,159 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,887 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,682 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,835 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,183 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,729 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,124 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,471 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,521 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 79.9%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.4%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chinese |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Poor 9.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Fair 13.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.3%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 19.4%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.24%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.4% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.6%), male disability (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |