Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Yugoslavians

Exceptional
Good
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yugoslavian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,289,093 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.436% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 435.5 Yugoslavians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $58,243, a difference of 13.1%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $82,186, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $100,119, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,028, a difference of 0.45%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $53,967, a difference of 4.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanYugoslavian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Fair
$42,792
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Fair
$100,119
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Poor
$82,186
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Fair
$45,846
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Fair
$53,967
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$51,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Poor
$91,368
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Fair
$97,558
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$58,243
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
26.7%

Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanYugoslavian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.7%

Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanYugoslavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanYugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Good
83.0%

Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 7.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanYugoslavian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Good
30.8%

Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanYugoslavian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Average
6.3%

Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanYugoslavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
1.7%

Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Yugoslavian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanYugoslavian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.5%