Immigrants from Nepal vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,653,883 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 15.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,190 compared to $116,156, a difference of 13.7%), and median household income ($87,046 compared to $98,496, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,704 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.9%), median earnings ($47,925 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($55,615 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 31.8%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.1%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 58.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 35.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.8%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.2%).