Marshallese vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,631,724 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to a decrease of 39.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,455 compared to $116,156, a difference of 28.4%), median household income ($78,930 compared to $98,496, a difference of 24.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,575 compared to $104,264, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.6%), median female earnings ($36,459 compared to $41,461, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 55.1%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 52.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 40.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.4%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.94%), average family size (3.38 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.7% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.2%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.5%).