German Russian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,863,421 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to a decrease of 36.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $77,465, a difference of 39.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $116,156, a difference of 29.9%), and median household income ($75,856 compared to $98,496, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $41,461, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($43,200 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 55.8%), single female poverty (23.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.8%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and single male poverty (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and married-couple households (44.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.1%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.5%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.27%), disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.0%).