Zimbabwean vs Paiute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,880,868 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Paiute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 57.6 Paiute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $82,629, a difference of 29.3%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $85,414, a difference of 28.8%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $72,959, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,743, a difference of 0.94%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $36,056, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 103.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 67.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 85.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 72.3%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.1%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 48.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 68.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.5%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 232.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.2%).