Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,548,055 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.330% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 329.9 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $68,960, a difference of 22.5%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $57,114, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $116,626, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $70,103, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $57,818, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.53%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.89%), family households (64.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.6%).