Asian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,774,982 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $77,465, a difference of 12.6%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $56,872, a difference of 12.2%), and median earnings ($53,690 compared to $48,836, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $58,162, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $98,496, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.88%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 12.9%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.4%), male disability (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.8%).