Zimbabwean vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,990,164 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.856. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.763% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 762.7 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $54,474, a difference of 20.9%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $92,231, a difference of 19.3%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $39,372, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,275, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $36,904, a difference of 10.5%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $43,026, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 70.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 64.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 27.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.0%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 70.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.44%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%).