Osage vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
Chinese
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,970,518 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.988. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.896% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 896.4 Chinese.
Osage vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $77,465, a difference of 39.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $116,156, a difference of 31.4%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $98,496, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $56,872, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.5%).
Income Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Average 25.9% |
Osage vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 51.4%), single female poverty (24.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.2%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.5%).
Poverty Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Osage vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 39.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Osage vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Osage vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.3%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Osage vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.9%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Osage vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.6%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and associate's degree (41.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Osage | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Osage vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 60.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.3%).
Disability Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |