Zimbabwean vs Ukrainian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,444,820 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Ukrainians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 29.1 Ukrainians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $59,728, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,843, a difference of 5.0%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $48,014, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,618 compared to $91,456, a difference of 0.92%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $111,368, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $108,475, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.27%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.3%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.5%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.6%).