Zimbabwean vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,137,136 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 38.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $54,163, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $90,266, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $41,261, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,202, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,846, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 74.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 54.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 45.4%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.3%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 188.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 64.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 23.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 49.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 61.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.7%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.5%).