Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chinese
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,838,079 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.332% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 332.1 Chinese.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $77,465, a difference of 21.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $116,156, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,913 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.16%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.84%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |