Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,886,349 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.290% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 289.8 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $118,056, a difference of 19.8%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $66,903, a difference of 18.8%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $53,806, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $69,872, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $57,123, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.35%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and family households (64.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%).