Zimbabwean vs Danish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Danes

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Danish Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,784,601 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Danes within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.136% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 135.6 Danes.
Zimbabwean Integration in Danish Communities

Zimbabwean vs Danish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Danish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.7%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $37,730, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $63,117, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,246, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $105,619, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $97,221, a difference of 1.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Danish Income
Income MetricZimbabweanDanish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Good
$44,095
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Excellent
$105,900
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Excellent
$87,676
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Average
$46,392
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Excellent
$56,246
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$37,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Excellent
$53,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Excellent
$97,221
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$105,619
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Exceptional
$63,117
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
31.0%

Zimbabwean vs Danish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Danish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Danish Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanDanish
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.0%

Zimbabwean vs Danish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Danish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanDanish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%

Zimbabwean vs Danish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Danish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanDanish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
44.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Zimbabwean vs Danish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Danish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.6%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.80%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Danish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanDanish
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
51.1%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
50.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Zimbabwean vs Danish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 22.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Danish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanDanish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
93.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
63.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
24.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Zimbabwean vs Danish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Danish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 21.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Zimbabwean vs Danish Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanDanish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Zimbabwean vs Danish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Danish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Danish Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanDanish
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%